By Joe Best
Normally, when I cook,
I'm on my own in the kitchen. Today, I have a sous-chef, and it's a
supercomputer.
The recipe for my
lunch has been supplied by Watson -- yes, that Watson, the IBM-made,
Jeopardy-winning computing system. Watson has swapped its quiz show
contestant's get-up for chefs' whites, and has been getting down and dirty in
the kitchen.
As part of a recent
initiative called Cognitive Cooking, Watson has been putting its
smarts to work by dreaming up new recipes. Which is why I'm now setting to work
cooking up a dish of Kenyan Brussel Sprouts Gratin. And no, that's not a typo.
I'm not the first
person to cook up one of Watson's quirky dishes. At this year's SXSW festival and
IBM's recent Pulse conference, a team of cooks served up dishes based on
recipes generated by Watson and chefs, including Vietnamese Apple Kebab and Belgian
Bacon Pudding.
The dishes may seem a
little off kilter, but that's the plan: the system is designed to come up with
novel dishes -- surprising combinations that might not have occurred to human
cooks. IBM's work was inspired by the idea of trying to make machines think
creatively.
"Creativity is
often considered as the pinnacle of human intelligence so that sounded like an
interesting challenge," said Florian Pinel, a senior software engineer at
IBM.
The Cognitive Cooking
version of Watson uses three criteria to devise the recipes:
1. Surprise -- How similar the recipe is to others already out there
2. Pleasantness -- How good the dish is likely to taste and smell
3. Pairing -- How well the different flavour compounds in the dish will work together
1. Surprise -- How similar the recipe is to others already out there
2. Pleasantness -- How good the dish is likely to taste and smell
3. Pairing -- How well the different flavour compounds in the dish will work together
The latter is based on
the theory that the more flavour compounds ingredients in a dish share, the
better the dish will taste, says Pinel. It's an idea common in Western cooking,
but less so in Eastern cuisine, where it's more common to have flavours that share
fewer compounds.
Still in its early
stages, the system has three basic inputs users can control: selecting a choice
of ingredient, a particular country's cuisine, and a type of dish. Once the
parameters are set, the system will offer up tens of potential suggestions for
dishes, which can then be narrowed down according to preference -- more
surprising dishes could be bumped up the list, or dishes that are less
surprising, but have a higher chance of tasting good, could be selected.
Eventually, the system
could one day be packaged up and offered to home cooks as an app, able to take
information from the user's Instagram feed or their grocery list, and customise
its results accordingly to make meal suggestions. Does every smartphone snap
show you're ordering a burrito? Knowing it's your favourite food, Watson's
at-home recipes could be customised to give a hundred variations on the
burrito, inspired by cuisines from around the world; equally, knowing you're
getting heartily sick of eating the same thing day after day, it could steer
you away from recipes that feature Mexican flavours or come wrapped in a flour
tortilla.
For now, the system
relies very much on cooperation with humans -- it may be able to tell you what
ingredients should feature in your Honduran avocado pie, but it doesn't advise
on quantities, cooking times or methodology. That's down to human chefs to come
up with.
And, at the other end
of the process, Watson can't cook the dish either: that's down to the person in
the kitchen. While Watson can offer up a recipe with input from smart machines
and skilled chefs, the success of the dish is still down to the human in the
kitchen, as I was reminded in polite terms when I asked IBM for a
Watson-generated dish I could try cooking, to see how the system's Willy Wonka
creativity worked in a home cook's kitchen.
For me, Watson came up
with a Kenyan Brussels Sprout Gratin. On that title alone, Watson knocked it
out of the park on the surprise factor, but did it deliver on the taste side of
things?
The dish (which is
shown above) came in three parts: a sweet potato puree flavoured with celery,
ginger and garlic; crispy fried and spiced sprouts; and a gremolata topping.
The signs weren't good - while I love brussel sprouts, I always confront any
dish containing sweet potatoes with a mix of fear and suspicion.
After a few minutes of
inhaling the scent coming off the frying puree ingredients, I was starting to
think maybe Watson was onto something. By the time I started on the second part
of the dish, I realised that brussel sprouts and cardamom were like the Romeo
and Juliet of foods - a beautiful pair, destined to be together, kept apart by
cruel forces that didn't understand how right they were as a team. Sure, the
gremolata had enough garlic to keep away vampires, and likely most humans for
that matter, but I couldn't help but think that I'd been judging sweet potatoes
too harshly once I got to try the finished dish.
Maybe when it comes to
working out what veggies go well with each other, a huge computing system has
an advantage on a mere human and its fallible palate?
A
new generation of foodies
Technology has always
played with our food. When chrome-clad homes of the future began turning up in
newsreels of the 1950s and 60s, technology was the avatar of progress - what a
brave new world awaited us if the cutting edge of science could even
revolutionise the humble kitchens.
Today in the West,
cooking is seen as part chore to be automated, part symbol of affluence or
otherwise. Still, technology plays its part in how we prepare, eat and enjoy
our food. Instagramming your lunch al desko being perhaps the most obvious (and
most derided) example of where food and everyday technology meet.
While we may have long
been happy to hand over the grunt work of food preparation to machines -- food
processors have been around since the 40s, and their predecessors the food
mills for centuries more -- soon, it looks like they'll not just be doing the
dull stuff we don't want to, but helping us execute our more creative culinary
visions.
Ground
meat can be used in the Foodini to make real burgers.
Image:
Natural Machines
As prices for 3D printing kits drop,
companies are beginning to see potential for the technology in consumer, as
well as industrial, markets. Chocolate was one of the first foodstuffs to get
attention from researchers and academics looking into 3D printing
possibilities, and now machines targeted at home cooks who want to print their
own sweet stuff are hitting the market.
With price tags
running into the several thousands of dollars, for now they look to be the
preserve of chocolatiers looking to give themselves an edge with sweet design,
or marketing companies creating bespoke, and edible, collateral.
While not cheap -- it
will be priced around $1,300 -- the Foodini
3D printer is aimed at home cooks as well as neighbourhood
cafes, and can print more than just sugar fixes. Once pureed and put into
Foodini capsules, food can be extruded into the shape of the user's choosing.
The idea behind the Foodini is that users can print out sweet
and savoury foods, including pasta, pizza, biscuits, and quiche, but using
fresh ingredients.
"You might ask,
why would you want to print that? You can get that in the supermarket,"
said Lynne Kucsma, cofounder of Foodini's maker Natural Machines. "Well,
that's the point. If you ever read the ingredients list, it's not exactly healthy,
there's a lot of preservatives, and even if you go for the organic version,
there's still a lot of salt and oil, and you have preservatives because it's a
packaged food, so it's much better to print your own. Even though crackers and
breadsticks might sound simple, have you ever made those things by hand?
They're not simple to make."
The first generation
Foodini will be rolling off the production line later this year, and for now is
chiefly a 3D printer that can help you with your food presentation rather than
one that will do away with the labour of making a meal. In the future however,
the company is hoping to expand the features of the machine so that it can cook
the food it prepares. In the first generation of the machine (shown printing
pizza below), printed pasta still needs to be cooked, and printed marinara
sauce would still need to be warmed up in a saucepan. Potentially, later
versions of the machine could deliver both elements, fully formed and steaming
hot, on a plate, inching one dish closer to a real life Star Trek replicator.
RFID chips, too, could
be added to capsules in future: if a user inadvertently put the wrong capsule
in the wrong slot -- pasta dough where the filling should be and vice versa,
for example -- the machine would be able to read the chips and correct its
operations before accidently turning out frankenpasta. Presumably, it could
also be used for health and safety purposes too, like scanning the chip to make
sure that the capsule is still in date.
One day 3D food
printers could go even further,
swapping data with connected fridges in users' kitchens to adjust recipes
according to what's available at the time, or placing the ingredients for a
planned meal into your online grocery shopping basket ahead of time. (Such
capabilities have been talked about by electronics manufacturers for some time,
but their clunky implementation means they're more theoretical for now.)
Connected devices
could also offer users the chance to make restaurant food at home -- as 3D food
printers get more advanced, they could potentially download recipes devised by
local eateries or celebrity chefs, order the right capsules, and have the whole
lot ready to go by the time you get home from work. Takeaway schmakeaway.
Both download-a-chef
3D printing and IBM's Cognitive Cooking experiment raise interesting questions
about the nature of creativity in cooking.Talk to the providers of the tech and
they'll tell you that chefs are enthused about the possibilities that
technology can open up, that it will be a complement to their skills and that,
even in a technology-heavy restaurant industry, their creativity will still be
needed.
In one restaurant in
China, however, man is already starting to be displaced by machine. In the Robot Restaurant in Harbin province,
dishes are prepared by robot chefs and delivered to the table by robot waiters.
"If you ever read the ingredients list,
it's not exactly healthy, there's a lot of preservatives, and even if you go
for the organic version, there's still a lot of salt and oil...so it's much
better to print your own."Lynne
Kucsma, Natural Machines
Not only does it draw
in the punters but it also helps cut down the restaurant's wage bill,according to its manager. The robot workers
may be a fun gimmick, but they're more like the 1930 visions of robot butlers
than autonomous or creative chef-replacements -- humans are required to prepare
the raw materials that the robots cook, and diners have to take their meals
from their robotic servers themselves, as they lack the motor skills to move
the plates from the tray their carry.
Elsewhere, however,
more conventional technology that's likely to have an impact on staffing levels
is making its way into the food industry.
Tablet
table service
What looks to be the
biggest rollout of tablets in the food industry was announced last year by US
chain Applebee's, which has over 1,800 outlets in
the country.
By the end of 2015,
the company expects to have 100,000 tablets installed in its restaurants, where
diners will be able to add extra dishes to their orders, play games, and pay
for their meals via the Intel-powered devices on their tables.
The move was prompted
by a need to cut wait times. "Let's face it, everyone who has ever been to
a restaurant has been frustrated by waiting for their check," Applebee's
president Mike Archer said when the news was announced in December.
"Starting out, our goal was to create a way for guests to control when and
how they pay their check. What we learned after nearly two years of testing is
we can provide much more. The Presto tablet will deliver our guests a
robust slate of offerings for not only transactions, but entertainment, social
interaction and more, moving forward."
According to the
company, a pilot of the tablets led to "significantly reduced transaction
times for guests." Applebee's is now planning to rollout the tablets
"aggressively" over the year, though there's no hard details on the
deployment timetable yet.
And it's not just
chains that are investing in the technology. Asian-fusion restaurant Inamo,
which has two locations in London, has had a human-free ordering system since
it opened in 2008. Diners can order food and drinks by way of a mouse-pad built
into the tables. Using overhead projectors, guests can scroll through pictures
of dishes, place their orders, request the bill, and even play a game of Battleship
against their dining companion.
Image: Buzztime
Adding such ways of
ordering will presumably have other benefits in the longer term as the
technology becomes more advanced -- fewer slips-ups with the orders, an ability
for those with food allergies to check the contents of a dish, and advice on
expected wait times for those in a hurry.
But it could equally
lead to fewer wait staff in restaurants. If the ordering and payment is handled
by machines, the workload for servers could be cut to just bringing food from
kitchen to table and collecting empty plates. Bad news for the huge numbers of
serving staff employed around the world,over 2.3 million in the US alone.
Restaurants often
pitch the addition of technology as a way to "enhance the dining experience"
or process more orders in a given time, particularly in the fast food sector,
rather than as a way to cut headcount. However, for chains as well as small
restaurants, the appeal of minimising the wage bill is likely to be undeniable,
particularly as diners appear to favour fewer dealings with staff. Applebee's
reported that in the pilot phase of its tablet experiment that diners reported
a "better experience overall" with the tablets than without.
In the future it's
quite possible that restaurant staff will mirror the transition of those in
supermarkets where self-service tills have been introduced, overseeing several
diners placing their orders electronically, and stepping in in the event of
problems. An entirely server-free restaurant, however, is unlikely -- not
everyone is a fan of touchscreens over the human touch, particularly those who
are traditionally not huge adopters of tech, such as some older diners.
Many organisations are
targeting the demographic nonetheless, including the Performance project, which recently won
European Commission funding to help develop food which has had its structure
altered in such a way to allow people with chewing and swallowing problems,
normally only able to eat mashed food, to eat a more visually appealing meal.
The genesis of the
project was a concept developed by Germany company Biozoon,
called smooth food. Typically, for those with mastication or swallowing
problems, eating means a succession of pureed food.
"The Presto tablet will deliver our
guests a robust slate of offerings for not only transactions, but
entertainment, social interaction and more, moving forward."Mike Archer, Applebee's president
"In nursing
homes, people that suffer from mastication and swallowing problems get served
mashed food, and it's unappealing looking. This is suitable for them to eat,
but they get this kind of food everyday and the joy of eating is not there
anymore," Sandra Forstner, R&D Project Manager at Performance, said.
Biozoon developed a
texturising material that could be added to the mashed food. Once the purees
were put into silicon moulds and cooked, they resemble the food they originally
came from, breaking up the monotony of texture and appearance for diners.
However, for nursing
homes where a higher number of residents have special eating needs, making tens
of individual dishes can take too much manpower to be efficient.
"We thought maybe
we can somehow industrialise [production] and, what's more important in this
case, personalise it. You can't force someone to eat more than they want but
you can increase the calorific value -- maybe someone needs smaller portions
sizes -- but we can enrich it somehow with fats or supplements. That's where we
said, 'Okay, how can we produce personalised meals simply?'" Forstner
said.
Performance, a
coalition of companies of which Biozoon is a member, looked to 3D printing, and
is now working with a company that's adapting its existing food printers,
usually used to print thin layers onto flat surfaces (think icing on biscuits),
to print 3D structures out of the smooth food. The smooth food will eventually
be packaged up -- a mix of vegetables, meats and carbohydrates -- and sold as
microwaveable meals that can be delivered to nursing homes or people at home.
It's hoped when the
meals go on sale in the next few years, they'll be able to be tailored to a
customer's individual requirements: the portion size they need, any additional micronutrients
they might require, how robust a texture they can handle -- perhaps even
adjusting flavours themselves to suit a particular palate.
From
farm (to cloud) to fork
An increase in 3D
printed food tailored to consumers on a very precise level could also be
beneficial to individuals' health in a more simple way: by allowing them to
keep tabs on what they're eating.
Data from 3D printed
food could enable users to build up a day-to-day picture of the micronutrients
and calories they've taken in, helping with monitoring of health conditions
like diabetes as well as offering a tool for weight control. Until the
technology becomes both more sophisticated and more widespread however, there
is no shortage of companies offering apps for the same purpose.
Image: Consumer Physics
Currently, they're
fairly simple affairs, often just a smartphone-based replacement for writing
down what you ate all day. Food intake is recorded through a text diary or
photo journal feature. The rub with food monitoring apps is that much relies on
manual input -- the user taking down the ingredients for the meal they've
consumed -- with the app then calculating the calories. For a single food like
an apple, that's not so hard. For something with more ingredients, like a black
forest cake or a mixed salad, the caloric and nutritional range can be wider,
and would require entering each ingredient manually and guessing the amount of
each element that the dish contains.
One solution to the
problem could be greater use of image recognition software -- building in
features that would let users snap their meal, and then have the app work out
the fruit it's looking at, its size and calorific value. However, there are
naturally limits to what photo recognition can cope with: a vegan cake would
look much like a dairy-laden equivalent, oven chips would resemble fried chips.
There are several
startups that are already turning to higher-tech ways of answering the problem.Consumer
Physics for example, has created a food scanner that uses
near-IR spectrometry. The scanner, called SCiO, just raised over $2 million on
Kickstarter.
The handheld scanner
works by directing a beam of near-IR at a piece of food. Each functional group
in the food molecules absorbs a different part of the near-IR spectrum to a
different extent. Water would have a different absorption pattern to sugar, for
example. The near-IR that bounces back to the scanner is then analysed to work
out the composition of the food it's pointing at, and the nutritional details
displayed on an mobile app.
What all of these
systems, low and high tech alike, have in common is that they're pitched to
potential customers on the grounds that, by getting a greater insight into
eating patterns, individuals will be able to make better decisions about what
they choose to eat.
For those just hoping
to keep their weight under control or eat more healthily, does knowledge really
equal power? Does knowing a pint of beer is 500 calories and a kebab 1,500 mean
we won't have one after several of the other?
"It's not enough
to collect this data... if you're writing down everything you're tracking on
your weight, if you're not regularly looking at how much you're taking in and
thinking about 'Wow, what happened that day why did I get so much more calories
on that day?', if you're not regularly doing that, you're not going to be
successful in changing your behaviour," Dr. David Cooper, a psychologist
with the Mobile Health Program at the National Center for
Telehealth and Technology, told a Self
Spark lifehacking event recently.
"Food safety concerns are also driving
the technologisation of food."Mandy Saven, Stylus
Gathering that data is
one thing, but using it as a prompt to change behavior is another. Technology
can only provide you with the information, but it's still down to the user to
review it, make changes, gather more information, and repeat the process. "It's
all about feedback and generating that feedback loop," Cooper said.
For those with a food
allergy, however, gathering very simple data can still be hugely useful.
Another startup TellSpec is working on similar food
scanning tech in the form of a handheld spectrometer and combined with a mobile
app, giving users an insight into the nutritional make-up of their food -- the
calories, sugar, and fat content -- along with the presence of allergens like
gluten. Their feedback loop is more likely to be a short one: I have a nut
allergy. Does this have nuts in it? Better not eat it then.
But for the
allergy-free, tech can still be used to improve food and drink safety.
Companies are working on food labelling that can give consumers further insight
into the history of their food as it travels from farm to fork (or factory to
fork).
Whether it's high or
low tech, food safety will be driving the need to put more technology on our
plates.
"Food safety
concerns are also driving the technologisation of food," Mandy Saven, head
of food, beverage & hospitality at Stylus, said. "Towards this end, we
see restaurant chains utilise technology to convey provenance and authenticity
of ingredients. Harney Sushi restaurant, in the US, actually places QR codes -
produced using soy-based ink on edible paper - on pieces of sushi, thus
enabling diners to immediately validate the sustainability credentials of the
food via their smartphones."
Other startups are
working on food safety tech, mostly aimed at manufacturers and retailers
themselves, but over time as mass production ramps up and costs come down, such
labels could end up on food at item level, allowing consumers to see for
themselves if their groceries have made it from producer to plate in the
conditions it should have.
Thinfilm Electronics,
based in Norway, uses printed electronics to create labels that provide details
on whether the item it's attached to has been transported outside of certain
parameters. For example, if boxes of milk were stored at temperatures that were
too high to prevent the growth of bacteria.
No comments:
Post a Comment