Thursday, October 29, 2015

Travelers Are Taking No-Frills Cruises on Ocean Freighters (BusinessWeek)

With business weak, cargo vessels are happy to carry tourists, too.
CMA CGM’s Rigoletto

In recent years, big cruise operators such as Carnival, Royal Caribbean, and Star Cruises have spent heavily on soaring atriums, sushi bars, cabaret shows, and on-deck water slides to woo vacationers. Don’t tell that to John McGuffick, who’s spent months at a time at sea on cargo vessels—happily ensconced in quarters more suited to a Trappist monk than a Caribbean cruiser.

“The food can be pretty ordinary, and you have to be prepared to go with the flow,” says the 72-year-old retired farmer from Australia whose 10 trips via ocean freighter have taken him to dozens of ports across Asia, Europe, and North America. His personal maritime endurance record: 110 days nonstop from Dunkirk, in northern France, to Singapore. 

Explains McGuffick: “I like the solitude.”

Onboard entertainment options include: Ping-Pong, reading your book(s), walking around the massive deck, eating with the crew, and surprise port visits!
Onboard entertainment options include: Ping-Pong, reading your book(s), walking around the massive deck, eating with the crew, and surprise port visits! 

Shipping companies like the dollars passengers such as McGuffick can bring aboard. In a slowing global economy, freight prices have fallen so far that hauling a person from Shanghai to Rotterdam brings in at least 10 times more revenue than a 20-foot container full of flat-packed furniture.

It’s not luxurious and not exactly cheap: About $115 a day secures travelers a bed and three meals on some of the largest vessels ever built. The handful of paying passengers—ships typically take no more than a dozen at a time—dine with the crew, have the run of most of the ship, and can chat up the captain on the bridge or engineers below deck. Forget about the vast housekeeping staffs cruise lines are known for. Freighter cabins are serviced once a week, and passengers have to wash their own clothes. Rather than poolside bars, there’s usually a modest supply of alcoholic drinks paid for via an honor system. While Internet access is limited, Ping-Pong tables, dartboards, a selection of CDs and DVDs, and books in a variety of languages help passengers pass the time.

The per-day passenger rate for a 23-day trip from Asia to Europe starts at $145 and includes a cabin, all meals, and port fees.
The per-day passenger rate for a 23-day trip from Asia to Europe starts at $145 and includes a cabin, all meals, and port fees.

Despite the meager comforts, there’s far more demand than marine freight companies can meet, says Julie Richards, who arranges 200 to 300 trips a year at Freighter Expeditions in Sydney. Passengers need to book months in advance on the most popular routes, between China and Europe, she says. “I get 10 to 20 e-mails a day, and three-quarters of them I can’t help,” she says, citing a dearth of passenger-carrying cargo ships. “It’s either people who haven’t started a job or it’s people who’ve retired.”

Global trade is increasing at only half the average annual pace of the past 20 years. That’s bad news for a worldwide fleet of 50,000 merchant ships that carry most of the planet’s traded goods. It’s good news for travelers, though, since it makes sense for the cargo ships to fill empty quarters with paying passengers. “It’s worth renting them out, particularly in times of low charter and freight rates,” says Ilka Bueltmann, passage department chief at German shipping company Rickmers Group, which takes passengers on seven of its freighters.

Hamburg Sued Group offers berths on iron ore carriers between Brazil and Europe. CMA CGM Group, the world’s No. 3 container shipping line, offers trips on the massive freighters—longer than four soccer fields—it shuttles between Southampton, England, and Ningbo, south of Shanghai on the East China Sea.

Passengers joining that voyage at Port Klang, near Kuala Lumpur, pay about A$2,500 ($1,800) for the 14-day leg to the Chinese port, including meals and port fees, Richards says. That will give them a double or twin bed in an air-conditioned, carpeted cabin, with their own bathroom, wardrobe, chest, writing table, chair, and window. The cost is $239 more than an ocean-view cabin on a 12-day Caribbean cruise on the 2,974-guest Carnival Liberty next March—but doesn’t include anything like the Liberty’s formal-night lobster dinner, seven bars, comedy club, or disco.

While a berth on the cargo vessel may be up to 10 floors above the sea, panoramic views aren’t guaranteed. That window could be blocked by shipping containers—15,000 of them. “It’s a working ship,” says Richards. “That’s what people have got to realize.”

With Nicholas Brautlecht

The bottom line: Cargo ships can charge much more per day to carry a vacationer than a fully loaded 20-foot shipping container of freight.


Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Facebook will give employees super slow internet speeds ...

Facebook

Facebook is launching a new initiative called "2G Tuesdays" that will give all employees an opportunity to see what using the app with an incredibly slow connection feels like and help close the "empathy gap" between Silicon Valley and emerging markets.

For most people, the stark differences will likely be jarring.

Engineering director Tom Alison remembers the first time he opened Facebook on a phone with a 2G connection.

"I felt like, 'Whoa!'" Alison tells Business Insider. "It definitely tested my patience — it felt like parts of the product were just broken."

Although most people with smartphones in the US use faster 3G or even 4G connections, millions of people all over the world are coming online for the first time with 2G. With that kind of connection, a webpage can take over two minutes to load.

That's why Alison and his team of emerging-markets engineers have spent so much time reworking Facebook's News Feed to optimize it for super-slow network speeds. 

As part of their job, they regularly use phones that simulate 2G and actually take trips to places like India and Kenya to get a better understanding of how people there use the product.

2G
But because not all employees get to go on international trips, Facebook is instituting "2G Tuesdays."

When a Facebook employee logs in to the app any Tuesday morning, they'll see a prompt at the top of their News Feed asking whether they want to try out the slower connection for an hour.

"For that next hour, their experience on Facebook will be very much like the experience that millions of people around the world have on Facebook on a 2G connection," Alison says. "They're going to see the places that we need to improve our product, but they're also going to see the places where we have made a lot of progress."

Earlier this month, Facebook highlighted some of the updates and improvements that it's made for the app in emerging markets.

For example, Facebook developed an open-sourced Network Connection Class system that lets its app figure out a user's connection speed on the fly. It will then show different News Feed stories — for example, favoring status updates and links versus videos and photos on a super-slow connection — and prioritize loading things that the user is looking at versus partially loading a dozen pieces of content at once.

"You really experience your own Facebook in a much different way on 2G," Alison says. "It's really a visceral feeling when you see your own content on this type of connection."

He anticipates that many employees will opt in to 2G Tuesdays — 2G Mondays just didn't sound nearly as catchy, he jokes — to get a better understanding of what the internet feels like for people in different parts of the world and to help report issues and make suggestions that his team might not have thought of.

Monday, October 26, 2015

Popcorn Time got burned, now all we have is Butter...






Over the past week, torrent-based movie and TV streaming service Popcorn Time has been slowly disintegrating. Under mounting pressure from legal and moral issues, a key segment of the development team split off. Creators tried to lift Popcorn Time technology out of the ethical Internet gray area in their launch of “piracy-free” Butter, but it seems it might be too late to save their legacy product.

The site running the most popular fork for Popcorn Time, popcorntime.io, has shut down. According to TorrentFreak, Popcorn Time developer Wally said, “I shutdown all the servers, there is nothing I can do anymore. I deleted any logs that can be harmful for any other dev.”

The decision to shut down comes after the site suffered extensive DNS attacks and tampering that made it difficult for the developers to successfully transfer the website to those who remain on the team.

Although popcorntime.io is down, the cached version of the website includes a note:

After the happy announcements of our little Butter brother, we have darker news to share. In the last few days someone has been tempering with our infrastructure, mainly our DNS service and we can’t convince our provider https://gandi.net that we are us and want to stay online. We’re doing our best to maintain the service but today we can’t give any timeline of things getting better. Please hang on, we’re working day and night to get this sorted out.

Clones of the service still exist, but this marks the elimination of the official — and most popular — successor to the original Popcorn Time. But there are other problems afoot: popular Popcorn Time library YTS (formerly known as YIFY) has experienced global outages, and variants are still being targeted by regulatory groups like the MPAA.

Butter isn’t in the clear either, as it is also experiencing a website shutdown. The project is still available on GitHub, however, and will likely stay alive once the dust settles.

In any case, it’s safe to say that Popcorn Time is woefully burnt and unlikely salvageable. It was fun while it lasted.

Friday, October 23, 2015

¿Qué Podemos Hacer Diferente en Tiempos de Crisis? (Edwin Conrado Rivera)

Edwin Conrado Rivera, MPH
International Trainer & Coach
EdwinConradoRivera@gmail.com
Miami, Fl. 33174

Crisis según “businessdictionary.com”, es un evento crítico o punto de decisión que, si no se maneja de manera adecuada y oportuna (o si no se manejan en absoluto), puede convertirse en un desastre o catástrofe.

Desde el comienzo de nuestros tiempos han existido crisis y no creo que vayan a terminar nunca, ya que esta es parte de un proceso cíclico natural de nuestra existencia.

Esto significa que tenemos dos maneras de responder a ellas. Una de manera negativa en la que nos hacemos eco del pensamiento de la masa y nos sumergimos en un desastre emocional, que en algunos casos llega hasta el suicidio.

La segunda de manera positiva, y el enfoque de este escrito, es cuando la crisis se convierte en el momento de mayores y reales oportunidades en la que tenemos que probar que nuestra Visión, Misión, Metas y Valores Corporativos han sido claramente descritas en nuestro Plan de Negocios.

Ahora bien, si no existe un Plan de Negocios formalmente establecido, definitivamente no vamos a llegar a cumplir con metas concretas.

Según Albert Einstein: Locura: hacer la misma cosa una y otra vez,  esperando resultados diferentes”.

Para movernos del estancamiento, de la pérdida o del lento crecimiento en tiempos de crisis, debemos considerar 3 pilares de negocios que la mayoría de los Directores no ponen en práctica.

1.     Innovación
2.     Creatividad
3.     Versatilidad
  
Innovación - El proceso de traducción de una idea o invención en un bien o servicio que crea valor o para los que los clientes pagarán.

La innovación es una idea nueva, dispositivo o proceso más eficaz. La innovación puede ser vista como la aplicación de las mejores soluciones que cumplan con los nuevos requisitos, necesidades inarticuladas, o las necesidades del mercado existentes.  Esto se logra a través de productos más eficaces, procesos, servicios, tecnologías o ideas que son fácilmente disponibles a los mercados, los gobiernos y la sociedad. El término innovación se puede definir como algo original y más eficaz y, por consecuencia, nuevas ideas en proyectos y servicios, que "se presentan en" el mercado o la sociedad.

Mientras que un nuevo dispositivo se describe a menudo, como una innovación, en la economía. La ciencia de la administración, y otros campos de la práctica y el análisis de la innovación que generalmente se considera que es un proceso que reúne varias ideas nuevas de una manera que tienen un impacto en la sociedad.

En los negocios y la economía, la innovación es el catalizador para el crecimiento.            

Con los rápidos avances en el transporte y las comunicaciones.  A través de las últimas décadas, los viejos conceptos del mundo en la adopción de diferentes factores y la ventaja comparativa, que se centraron en la presentación de un solo producto o servicio en un área específica, se quedaron anticuadas para la economía global de hoy.

El Economista Joseph Schumpeter, que contribuyó en gran medida al estudio de la economía de innovación, argumentó que las industrias deben revolucionar incesantemente la estructura económica desde adentro, deben innovar con mejores      o más eficaces procesos y productos. Además, los empresarios deben buscar continuamente mejores formas de satisfacer la base de consumidores con una mejor calidad, durabilidad, servicio y precio, entonces llegan a buen término en la innovación con tecnologías avanzadas y estrategias organizacionales

Un buen ejemplo es el auge explosivo de las nuevas empresas de Silicon Valley del Parque Industrial de Stanford. En 1957, los empleados insatisfechos de Shockley Semiconductor, (la compañía del premio Nobel y co-inventor del transistor William Shockley), decidió formar una firma independiente, Fairchild Semiconductor. Después de varios años, se convirtió en una formidable presencia en el sector.

Con el tiempo los empleados líderes iniciaron sus propias empresas. Durante los últimos 20 años, este proceso de bola de nieve lanzada, comenzó un movimiento de la innovación con la creación de 65 empresas de información tecnológica nacidas de ocho ex empleados de Shockley.

En el contexto de la organización, la innovación puede estar relacionada con cambios positivos en la eficiencia, la productividad, la calidad, la competitividad y cuota de mercado. Sin embargo, los resultados de investigaciones recientes ponen de relieve el papel complementario de la cultura organizacional, permitiendo mejoras tangibles de rendimiento.

Las organizaciones también pueden mejorar los beneficios y el rendimiento al proporcionar grupos de trabajo oportunidades y recursos para innovar.

Peter Drucker – (Peter Ferdinand Drucker fue un estadounidense, de origen austriaco, consultor de gestión, educador y autor, cuyos escritos contribuyeron a los fundamentos filosóficos y prácticas de la corporación empresarial moderna), escribió que:   

                  "La innovación es la función específica de la iniciativa empresarial, ya sea en un negocio ya existente, una institución de servicio público, o una nueva empresa fundada por un individuo solitario en la cocina de la familia. Es el medio por el cual el empresario      o bien crea nuevos recursos generadores de riqueza, o dota de los recursos existentes con mayor potencial de creación de riqueza".

Programas de innovación organizativa suelen estar estrechamente vinculados con las metas y objetivos de la organización, con el plan de negocios, y para comercializar el posicionamiento competitivo. Un director de programas de innovación en las empresas debe lograr los objetivos de crecimiento. Como Davila et al. (2006) señala,

                        "Las empresas no pueden crecer a través de la reducción de costos y la reingeniería solamente.  La innovación es el elemento clave en el crecimiento agresivo de primera línea, para aumentar los resultados finales".

Una encuesta a través de un gran número de organizaciones industriales y de servicios con programas sistemáticos de innovación revelaron los siguientes resultados:

·       Mejora de la calidad,
·       La creación de nuevos mercados,
·       La extensión de la gama de productos,
·       Reducción de los costos laborales,
·       La mejora de los procesos de producción,
·       Reducción en los inventarios,
·       Reducir el daño ambiental,
·       La sustitución de los productos / servicios,
·       La reducción de consumo de energía,
·       La conformidad con los reglamentos.

Los imitadores tienen menos riesgo porque van a empezar con el producto de un innovador y adoptan un enfoque más eficaz. Los ejemplos son IBM con su PC contra Apple Computer, Compaq con su PC más barata que IBM y Dell con sus clones aún más baratas contra Compaq. Haciendo los mercados más competitivos día a día.

Creatividad - La creatividad es un fenómeno por el cual se forma algo nuevo y de alguna manera valiosa. El elemento creado puede ser intangible (como una idea, una teoría científica, una composición musical o una broma) o un objeto físico original          (por ejemplo, una invención, una obra literaria o una pintura).

Hoy en día, la creatividad constituye la actividad principal de un sector creciente de        las economías llamadas "industrias creativas" globales, generando capital (generalmente no tangibles) y riqueza a través de la creación y explotación de la propiedad intelectual o mediante la prestación de servicios creativos.

Profesiones creativas incluyen la escritura, arte, diseño, teatro, televisión, radio, cine, artes relacionadas, así como la comercialización, estrategia, algunos aspectos de la investigación científica y el desarrollo, así como el desarrollo de productos. Dado que muchos profesionales creativos (actores y escritores, por ejemplo) también se emplean en las profesiones secundarias, las estimaciones de los profesionales creativos son a menudo inexactas.

Según algunas estimaciones, aproximadamente 10 millones de trabajadores estadounidenses son los profesionales creativos; dependiendo de la profundidad y amplitud de la definición, esta estimación puede ser el doble.

Se requiere creatividad en todas las etapas del proceso de desarrollo del producto, desde la generación de ideas de nuevos productos para su comercialización.     
                  
Un ambiente de trabajo que estimula la creatividad de los empleados en general es beneficioso para el rendimiento del producto de una empresa. Cuando las personas, de cualquier nivel de la organización, desarrollan capacidades creativas que puedan contribuir a la innovación, esto resultará en una empresa más dinámica y eficiente.

Todos los miembros de la organización pueden directamente (por ejemplo, como parte del desarrollo de nuevos productos (NPD) del equipo) o indirectamente contribuir a la innovación de los productos, especialmente en organizaciones menos estructuradas.

Ha sido el tema de varios estudios de investigación para establecer que la efectividad organizacional depende de la creatividad de la mano de obra en gran medida. 

Para cualquier organización, medidas de efectividad varían, dependiendo de su misión, el contexto del medio ambiente, la naturaleza del trabajo, el producto o servicio que produce, y las demandas de los clientes. Por lo tanto, el primer paso en la evaluación de la efectividad organizacional es entender la propia organización - cómo funciona, cómo se estructura, y como hace énfasis en los procesos de producción económica.

Amabile – (Teresa Amabile profesora de Edsel Bryant Ford en Administración de Empresas en la Unidad de Gestión Empresarial en Harvard Business School), sostuvo que para potenciar la creatividad en los negocios, se necesitan 3 componentes:
1.     Experiencia (técnicos, de procedimiento y el conocimiento intelectual),
2.     Habilidades de pensamiento creativo (la forma flexible e imaginativa personas se acercan a los problemas), y

3.    Hay 2 tipos de motivación:

La motivación extrínseca - factores externos, por ejemplo, la amenaza de ser despedidos u ofrecerle dinero como estimulo para alcanzar una meta.

La motivación intrínseca - viene desde el interior de un individuo, como la satisfacción y el disfrute del trabajo, etc.

Seis prácticas de gestión para fomentar la motivación son:

1.     Retos  - parear las personas con las asignaciones correctas;
2.     Libertad - dando a la gente la autonomía y los medios para lograr los objetivos;
3.   Recursos - tales como el tiempo, el dinero, el espacio, etc. Tiene que estar en forma el equilibrio entre los recursos y las personas;
4.   Características de grupos de trabajo - diversos equipos, de apoyo, donde los miembros comparten el entusiasmo, la voluntad de ayudar y reconocer los talentos de cada uno;
5.     El estímulo de Supervisión - reconocimientos, aclamaciones, adulaciones;
6.     Apoyo organizativo - énfasis en los valores, intercambio de información o la colaboración.
Nonaka: ( Ikujiro Nonaka, nacido el 10 de mayo 1935, es un teórico de la organización japonesa y profesor emérito de la Escuela de Postgrado de Estrategia Corporativa Internacional de la Universidad Hitotsubashi, mejor conocido por su estudio de  (“La gestión del conocimiento”), que examinó a varias empresas japonesas de éxito,   de manera similar vio la creatividad y la creación de conocimiento como importantes para el éxito de las organizaciones. En particular, se hizo hincapié en el papel que el conocimiento tácito tiene que jugar en el proceso creativo.

La creatividad se puede fomentar en las personas, en los profesionales y en el lugar de trabajo. Es esencial para la innovación, y es un factor que afecta el crecimiento económico de las empresas. En 2013 el sociólogo Silvia Leal Martín, utilizando el método de Innova 3DX, sugirió medir los distintos parámetros que fomenten la creatividad y la innovación: la cultura corporativa, el ambiente de trabajo, el liderazgo y la gestión, la creatividad, la autoestima y el optimismo, el registro de control y orientación de aprendizaje, la motivación y el miedo.

Versatilidad – (En las personas) - capaces de hacer muchas cosas diferentes o para adaptarse a las nuevas condiciones, o (de las cosas) capaz de ser utilizadas para muchos propósitos diferentes.

Para poder ser versátil, la persona tiene que tener un plan de trabajo bien estructurado y  organizado. Que incluya, el Plan de Negocios (la Visión, Misión, Metas, Valores,  las Métricas de Desempeño, el Plan de Ventas y Mercadeo dentro del Presupuesto Financiero de la Empresa),  el Organigrama Empresarial, el Flujograma de los Procesos, y todo documento legal necesario para el desarrollo y cumplimiento de las planes empresariales.

En resumen, La Innovación, La Creatividad y La Versatilidad trabajan unidas como parte de la pregunta:  ¿Qué Podemos Hacer Diferente en Tiempos de Crisis?

El autor es Contador, Auditor, Mentor Personal, Adiestrador Internacional y Autor del libro: La Diabetes: El Árbol de las Enfermedades. Además, desarrolla programas basadas en las necesidades de cada empresa. Para una consulta, contáctelo en:   EdwinConradoRivera@gmail.com                                                 


Thursday, October 22, 2015

How Bad Will It Get for American Express? (BusinessWeek)


As Costco cuts ties, Amex struggles to hang on.

Every year, they got together. Sometimes Costco’s top executives would fly to New York to meet with Kenneth Chenault, the chairman and chief executive officer of American Express, and his team. From the card company’s perch on the 50th floor of its tower in lower Manhattan, the Costco guys peered at the views of Wall Street and the Statue of Liberty. They were used to looking over a less inspiring sea of parking lots from the windows of Costco’s three-story headquarters in suburban Issaquah, Wash., decorated with Van Gogh reproductions purchased from Art.com.

When Chenault made the reverse trip to Issaquah, the Costco guys were tickled by how meticulously Amex choreographed his movements. “Ken Chenault would have an advance team come to our office before he visited,” says Paul Latham, Costco’s vice president for membership and marketing. “They planned everything—where he would enter the building, the route to the boardroom, where he’d sit at the table.” After breakfast, Chenault would often give an elaborate presentation about the performance of Amex’s Costco affinity card, using PowerPoint decks that looked like they took weeks, maybe months, to prepare. Costco just jotted down some notes for their CEO, Craig Jelinek, to talk about.

The Amex people, most of whom had MBAs, sometimes found it amusing to deal with Costco veterans who spoke about starting out stocking warehouse shelves. Less endearing was the habit Costco executives had of referring to Amex as a “vendor.” That made the Amex people seethe. After all, they represented one of America’s oldest corporations. But they smiled and said nothing, and the corporate marriage endured for 16 years.

Costco had a similar co-branded affinity card with Amex in Canada. As its contract neared expiration in 2014, Costco solicited bids from other financial institutions to see if it could get a better deal. It did, and chose Capital One and MasterCard. Chenault went all out to hold on to the discounter in the U.S. Costco’s costs to accept credit cards as part of its deal with Amex was about 0.6 percent of every purchase, people familiar with the arrangements say, which was pretty cheap for any retailer, but Chenault offered to cut them further. Still, Jelinek insisted on putting the U.S. business up for grabs, too.

Amex wasn’t happy about competing with global banks such as Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase and its archrivals Visa and MasterCard. But Chenault fought for the deal—even though his company might actually lose money in some cases when Costco customers swiped the card. As the negotiations dragged into January 2015, however, he became agitated and called his counterpart to remind him that Amex hadn’t only furnished Costco with its prestigious card; it had been Costco’s “trusted partner.” Jelinek interrupted, according to people who were briefed by Chenault about the call, and told him that as far as he was concerned, Amex was another vendor, just like the one that sold Costco ketchup. “If I can get cheaper ketchup somewhere else, I will,” he said. As rumors about the call spread, the rank and file who heard about it couldn’t believe someone from Costco had the nerve to insult Amex like that. Ketchup! Chenault called Jelinek a few weeks later to say Amex was pulling out.

Latham says Jelinek doesn’t remember making the ketchup comment, and that it was the Costco CEO who telephoned Chenault to break up. He says Citigroup and Visa offered better terms, and people familiar with the deal say Costco’s credit card costs would be virtually nothing. Costco also wanted its customers to have a Visa card that they could use in many more places than an Amex card. “The fact that Visa is the largest payments network, that acceptance for Visa cards is greater than any other cards in the U.S., that was certainly a factor,” Latham says.


On Feb. 12, Chenault broke the news to investors. The Canadian deal had prepared the market for such a possibility, but Chenault disclosed something stunning: 10 percent of the 112 million Amex cards were Costco-branded. Amex shares tumbled 6 percent that day. The magnitude of its Costco business amazed Moshe Orenbuch, an analyst at Credit Suisse who did some math and determined that Amex co-branded cards, which also included Delta, JetBlue, and Starwood Hotels, accounted for 23 percent of $1 trillion in overall card spending last year. “Amex maintains that it has the best brand,” Orenbuch says. “Yet they decided not to tell us that 23 percent of their business was actually co-branded, which means it’s using someone else’s brand. I find those two things somewhat inconsistent.”

In conference calls with investors, Chenault has said Amex ended the Costco deal for purely economic reasons. “The numbers didn’t add up,” he said in March. “We couldn’t accept their financial terms nor their contractual terms, some of which would have meant taking on more risk than we were comfortable with.” But the decision was also partially emotional, and it couldn’t have come at a worse time for Amex. Soon after the breakup with Costco, Bloomberg reports, JetBlue ditched Amex for Barclays and MasterCard. Fidelity may also be thinking about canceling its affinity card, which is furnished jointly by Amex and Bank of America, and possibly joining forces with Visa or MasterCard.

As the card deals unraveled, a federal judge ruled against Amex in a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice arguing that merchants have the right to discourage customers from using Amex cards because its high fees unfairly drive up the price of goods. (Amex is appealing the decision.) Chenault, who’s been CEO since January 2001, when Bill Clinton was president, declined to be interviewed for this story. He’s assured investors that Amex would absorb the losses not just because it was a strong company but also because of its aura. “Our brand is globally recognized,” he said in March. He has a point: Amex is a rarefied company. Its cardholders are more affluent than users of Visa or MasterCard. In 2014, Amex members spent an average $144 per purchase, compared with $84 for Visa users and $90 for MasterCard holders, according to the Nilson Report, a publication that tracks the card industry. Because it delivers higher-spending customers, Amex charges merchants an average swipe fee of 2.5 percent per transaction. Visa and MasterCard settle for 2 percent for their credit cards.

Amex also heavily advertises to convince the public that its cardholders are superior to those who dare use other kinds of plastic, sponsoring Taylor Swift music video apps and drafting Tina Fey to portray an adorably frazzled, Liz Lemon-like shopper in ads for its new Amex EveryDay credit card.

This formula has made the company tremendously profitable. Its return on equity, a measure of a bank’s profitability, was 28 percent in the second quarter, higher than that of all its card-issuing rivals. In May, Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, the credit card company’s largest shareholder, reiterated his support for Chenault. “Amex is still a very, very special company,” he said, adding, “Ken has done a sensational job.”

But Amex is in a situation that’s becoming increasingly familiar to companies with formerly impervious brands, such as Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and McDonald’s. For decades, they would charge extra for their products. Today their toothpaste, sodas, and burgers no longer have the same cachet. Worse for American Express and other credit card companies, technology is making the physical manifestation of their brand invisible. Who cares what card you have if you’re paying for your expensive meal through your smartphone’s digital wallet?

As Amex shares slumped, ValueAct Capital, a San Francisco activist hedge fund, disclosed in August that it had almost $1 billion of Amex stock. Jeffrey Ubben, the fund’s chief executive, has yet to disclose his plans. But he has a history of investing in companies and shaking things up, which has been followed by the departures of CEOs, most notably Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer. For Chenault, this may be a moment to reflect on whether he can be most helpful to Amex’s other shareholders by sticking around and fighting, or by making a graceful exit.

Chenault frequently evokes his 165-year-old company’s legacy. Three years ago, he appeared onstage at the American Museum of Natural History for what was billed as a “fireside chat” with Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg. It was a tech event, so Chenault didn’t wear his usual suit and tie. Instead, he showed up in a brown zipper-neck sweater and an open-collar shirt. Yet his dark slacks were creased, and his shoes gleamed as if they’d just been polished. “How do you innovate?” Sandberg asked him.

Smiling, Chenault replied that Amex knew a bit about the subject. “We didn’t start off in a dorm room or a garage,” he said. “Probably in a stable.” Founded in 1850, Amex transported packages from the East to the West Coast by stagecoach. It was a nice business until President William Howard Taft signed a bill in 1912 allowing the U.S. Post Office to carry packages at lower rates. Luckily, Amex had developed a product called the Traveler’s Cheque, which people could purchase in the U.S. and cash in Europe. Amex transformed itself into a global travel agency, planning footloose Americans’ trips, finding them English-speaking doctors in Europe and bottled water in Africa, and, for the right price, according to a 1956 Time cover story, organizing tours of Pygmy villages in Africa—anything to sell more Traveler’s Cheques.

In 1950, Diners Club introduced the first multipurpose charge card. Some at Amex thought their company should respond with its own card; others feared this would cannibalize the traveler’s check. After much hand-wringing, Ralph Reed, who ran Amex at the time, approved the first Amex card, which appeared in 1958. Five years later, there were a million cards “in force,” as the company likes to say.

Amex has faced trouble before. In the wake of the 1987 stock market crash, merchants started to turn away the Amex card because of its hefty swipe fees, which at the time were as high as 3.5 percent. In 1991, a group of 100 restaurateurs in Boston staged what became known as the Boston Fee Party. “There was a big recession going on,” says Steve DiFillippo, owner of Davio’s, a popular Italian restaurant in the city and one of the Fee Partiers. “The garbage guys and the meat guys were helping us out, but American Express wasn’t doing anything for us.” Visa did its best to make the situation worse with an ad campaign featuring celebrity chefs such as Wolfgang Puck and other merchants who didn’t take American Express.


Chenault led the effort to fix the problem. A native of Hempstead, N.Y., he was a graduate of Bowdoin College in Maine and Harvard Law School. In a Businessweek profile published three years before he became CEO, his college roommates and Amex colleagues described him as someone who was determined to rise to the top while maintaining tight control over his personal brand, never losing his temper or even raising his voice. He started at Amex in 1981 in the strategic planning division and applied his skills to a moribund operation that peddled jewelry and stereo equipment through the mail to cardholders. Chenault impressed his bosses by boosting sales from $150 million to $500 million and ended up in charge of travel-related services, which included the card division. He thought Amex should lower its fees for smaller merchants like DiFillippo to keep them in the fold. At the same time, he held the line with airlines that relied on Amex’s big-spending cardholders. “Ken was spectacular,” says Tom Ryder, a former Amex executive. “He was the leader of the turnaround effort. He’s not CEO for no reason.”

To the horror of elitists within Amex, Chenault pushed for blue-collar establishments such as Wal-Mart Stores to accept the card. But the most important deal was the one that the company struck in 1999 with Costco. At the time, Costco operated only 221 warehouses in the U.S. Its customers, however, who had to pay $40 a year to get in the door, tended to be affluent. “We tried to convince them that they should accept Amex,” recalls David House, a former executive at the credit card company who worked on the deal. “They kept saying, ‘It will never work. It’s too expensive.’ ” After much negotiating, Amex persuaded Costco to end its exclusive deal with Discover Financial Services and let Amex issue a Costco-branded credit card that would be the only one accepted at its warehouses. According to House, Amex didn’t have to lower its swipe fee to get the transaction done. Instead, he says, it agreed to pay Costco a bounty for every new cardholder it brought in.

At the contract signing in 1999 at Costco’s headquarters, Jim Sinegal, then the company’s CEO, seemed thrilled to be going into business with Amex. “This is a contract for life,” House recalls him saying.

The arrangement turned out to be hugely beneficial to Amex. By 2004, the number of Costco warehouses in the U.S. had risen nearly 50 percent since the alliance, to 327. Meanwhile, the total number of Amex cards rose from 46 million to 65 million. “Costco would have been a big contributor to that growth,” says Jason Arnold, a research analyst at RBC Capital Markets. Chenault, who’d become CEO three years earlier, ingratiated himself with Sinegal. Although they personified two different corporate cultures, by all accounts, the two men got along well, even when their relationship was tested by the financial crisis of 2008. Plagued by souring credit card loans, Amex won approval from the Federal Reserve to become a commercial bank, which enabled it to get $3.4 billion in funding from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Amex also canceled cards, including some belonging to Costco members, which upset the retailer. “At that time, there was tension between the companies,” says Robert Ritchie, a former Amex manager who worked on the Costco account. “We had to mend the relationship.” The discussions were delicate; a discount chain where people bought 80 rolls of toilet paper was now able to push around the century-and-a-half-old company with the centurion logo.

Amex emerged from the crisis in a stronger position than its card-issuing rivals, which relied less on swipe fees and more on revolving credit. In Washington, there was talk that President Obama wanted Chenault in his cabinet, possibly as secretary of the Treasury, in his second term. That didn’t happen, but Chenault sounded increasingly like a politician. He became interested in marketing cards and services to people on the opposite end of the spectrum from Amex’s Platinum Card holders. In 2010, Amex paid about $300 million for Revolution Money, an Internet payments company for people without traditional bank accounts, and rebranded it Serve, which sounded more like a cause than a business.

In 2012, Amex launched BlueBird, a prepaid charge card with Wal-Mart that it promoted as a low-cost alternative to debit and checking accounts. In investor calls this year, Chenault has said those products are growing fast, but Amex has yet to release revenue figures for them, which suggests they’re underwhelming. “I would estimate that they make up 2 percent of the company’s card spending,” says David Robertson, publisher of the Nilson Report. “They aren’t moving the needle yet.”

Meanwhile, Amex’s high-end customers were seeing the value of their cards dwindle. It used to be that flashing the Amex Platinum Card with its $450 fee would get you into most airport lounges. But as airlines merged, most recently American Airlines and US Airways in 2013, Amex cardholders lost access to many of these oases because of long-standing relationships their proprietors had with rivals. Amex reacted by creating its own airport havens, called the Centurion Lounge; there were 14 as of last year. Customers like them, but Amex has had to rent expensive space in airports and provide its members with gourmet meals, massages, and whatever else it might take to keep them from cutting their cards in half. “American Express’s response has been brilliant” in the short term, says Henry Harteveldt, a travel industry analyst and founder of Atmosphere Research Group. “But does Amex want to operate a network of lounges? No.”

JPMorgan and Barclays have poached Amex’s high-spending customers with generous card offers and lower annual fees. Two years ago, Chase cards surpassed Amex in American households making at least $125,000 a year, according to Phoenix Marketing International, a wealth research firm. In July 2014, Chenault spent two days testifying in the Justice lawsuit, arguing that his competitors had stolen his company’s methods and threatened its existence. “They’ve got a billion cards,” he lamented. “I got fewer than 55 million. They got 9 million merchants. I got around 6. I mean, I am dwarfed. We are swimming in a sea of bank cards.”

Even in this moment of public self-pity, the 64-year-old CEO showed off his Amex invitation-only Centurion Card, better known as the Black Card, to white-haired U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas Garaufis, who was born in 1948. “I’ve never actually seen one of those,” Garaufis confessed.

“Your honor, if you would permit me,” Chenault said, producing his own. “This is a Black Card. It’s made out of titanium. And what it has is a set of very specialized services, so concierge type of services. So you can almost think of it as your personal aide.”

“I see,” Garaufis said. “I’m going to need a personal aide at some point.”

“Well, after the trial and everything’s done,” Chenault said.

“I don’t want to know,” Garaufis said.

“Part of my job is to persuade,” Chenault said. Never mind that even the Black Card no longer has the same mystique with the young moneyed set that Amex desperately needs to attract. In 2004, Kanye West boasted about his, memorably referring to it in a song as the “African American Express card.” But last year, Young Thug, the rap icon and influencer of the moment, rhymed in the hedonistic hit Lifestyle about having a $1.5 million spending limit on his Visa card.



In February, Garaufis ruled against Amex, opening the door for merchants to steer customers away from its cards. Amex called his decision “flawed” and promised to appeal. But credit card experts don’t expect Amex to prevail. “Swipe fees as we know them today will be cut in half over the next decade,” says Steve Mott, CEO of BetterBuyDesign, a payments consulting firm. In late September, shares of Amex had fallen 22 percent for the year, making it one of the worst performers in the Dow Jones industrial average. The company’s declining value has inspired some investors to revolt. In July, a group of shareholders sued Amex for not disclosing the size of the Costco portfolio sooner. Amex declined to comment.

The company’s woes by then had attracted the activist hedge fund ValueAct, whose purchase of a 1.1 percent stake in Amex made it the 12th-largest shareholder. Ubben, the fund’s preppy-looking founder, typically favors companies he thinks are temporarily underpriced. He hasn’t decided yet whether he’ll wage a campaign to transform Amex or simply sell the fund’s position, people familiar with his thinking have said. Ubben’s options are limited. Activists often turn a profit by pressuring companies to increase their dividend or the amount of stock they repurchase. But ValueAct can’t use those tactics on Amex because, as one of the largest U.S. banks, it’s subject to regulations that restrict how much extra cash can go to investors. The Federal Reserve must also sign off on its dividend as part of an annual stress test process. ValueAct declined to comment.

ValueAct could try to revive Amex’s stock by precipitating a management change. If the fund’s managers, who have met with Chenault since the stock purchase, decide to take that route, they might pursue a behind-the-scenes strategy similar to the one that worked at Microsoft. ValueAct announced in 2013 that it had bought almost $2 billion of the tech company’s shares and demanded a board seat. Shortly before Microsoft acquiesced, Ballmer resigned as CEO and later stepped down from the board, saying he wanted to devote more time to the Los Angeles Clippers, the basketball team he owns. Since ValueAct unveiled its stake, Microsoft’s shares have risen 52 percent. Some investors would applaud if Ubben took a similar approach at Amex. “I think you have a CEO who has overstayed his welcome,” says Credit Suisse’s Orenbuch. The challenge may be picking Chenault’s replacement. Ed Gilligan, the Amex president widely seen as his successor, died after becoming ill in May while returning from a business trip in Tokyo.

American Express has a mandatory retirement age of 72 for directors, which means the board needs to plan for succession, but Chenault doesn’t sound like he’s leaving anytime soon. In conference calls since the Costco loss, he’s said that Amex has new products and card deals in the works that will enable it to recover. He’s also planning for what happens when the Costco deal expires in March and the cards no longer work in the stores. As part of Costco’s new agreement, Amex must sell the loan portfolio to Citigroup, a deal that the two banks are still negotiating. Chenault says the company will do whatever it can to get Costco cardholders to switch to regular Amex cards. But that will be difficult. Chenault frequently boasts about his company’s powerful brand, but Costco’s may be more alluring.

That was evident late one afternoon in September at the Costco in Wheaton, Md. Beverly Patterson exited with four frozen pizzas, her favorite brand of chicken with Japanese-style fried rice, and the store’s wheat bread, which she adores, in her cart. A school librarian who lives in nearby Silver Spring, Patterson said she loves her Amex card, too, but perhaps not enough to keep it once it’s no longer good at Costco. “My choices are particular,” she said. “Costco has what I like.”

The doors slid open again, and Jane Lee, from Bethesda, emerged. Lee had just been approved for a Costco Amex card, and she was proud of it. “You have to have perfect credit,” she said. But now that Costco was going to go with Visa, she’d have to go through the whole process again. It’s irritating, but what could Lee do? “I love Costco!” she said.