Friday, July 31, 2015

Microsoft Launches Windows 10 Without the Usual Hype (BusinessWeek)




Over the past 20 years, releases of new Windows operating systems have been marked by midnight sales parties, junkets crammed with reporters, and Microsoft’s biggest marketing campaigns. The introduction of Windows 10 on July 29 is much quieter: no ringing the Nasdaq opening bell, no promos with sitcom stars or Rolling Stones songs—just 13 parties around the world to thank volunteers who’ve helped debug and refine the operating system during the past year. “Having a big launch with celebrities, it might be news­worthy, but it’s not necessarily the step to a billion happy and engaged Windows users,” says Windows chief Terry Myerson.

Microsoft has promised share­holders that Windows 10 will reach 1 billion users within three years—which would give it the fastest adoption rate ever—even as the company shifts its focus to other products. It’s relying in large part on the 5 million volunteer bug testers, known as Windows Insiders, not only to make Windows 10 better but also to build loyalty for the OS. It’s a humbling acknowledgment that as consumers shift from PCs to smartphones and tablets, the software synonymous with Microsoft isn’t the required tool it once was. In 2000, Windows ran on 97 percent of the world’s consumer computing devices including phones and tablets, Goldman Sachs estimates; today, it’s under 20 percent.

Under Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella, Microsoft has begun to recognize that the biggest competition for a new version of Windows is no longer the previous version of Windows. To better spread Microsoft’s influence beyond its own operating systems, the company has acquired several makers of iOS and Android business apps and introduced new versions of Office apps on iOS and Android first. The OS division’s marketing chief, Yusuf Mehdi, is talking about winning customers back from “other ecosystems,” such as those created by Apple and Google. To do that, Microsoft has tried to make Windows 10 as intuitive and inviting as possible.

Windows 8, released in 2012, annoyed users by making the PC into a tablet, eliminating familiar features like the Start Menu in favor of a touchscreen system based on taps and swipes that only a small percentage of PCs could take advantage of or accommodate at all. The new edition restores the Start Menu and lets users switch more easily between the touchscreen setup and a more traditional point-and-click interface. It’s a lot more natural than the Windows 8 setup, if not exactly revolutionary.

Microsoft has also replaced its decrepit Web browser, Internet Explorer, with a new one called Edge, which is missing some customization options at launch but otherwise compares favorably with Chrome and Safari. The company’s Siri-like virtual assistant, Cortana, is built in, so you can bark out, “Tell Tim I’m running late,” and the OS will send an e-mail. Say, “Add milk to the grocery list,” and, with the help of GPS, Cortana texts your phone a reminder to buy milk when you’re in the parking lot at Stop & Shop. For its first year on the market, Windows 10 is free for consumers who have an earlier version of the OS, or $119 for those who don’t.

The biggest change was last September’s creation of the Windows Insider program, the group of consumers and business customers who agreed to download a series of early versions of the OS and try them out. Members sent feedback on each after using it for about 10 hours, shaping Windows 10 to a degree that would have been unimaginable for Microsoft a few years ago. The new OS has received a “surprisingly positive response” from companies, says Steve Kleynhans, an analyst at researcher Gartner. Easing people into the new interface has helped assuage fears about the notorious bugginess of past Windows releases.


Microsoft could use a hit. On July 21 the company announced a record $3.2 billion quarterly loss on $22.2 billion in revenue, owing to an almost total write-off of the Nokia phone business it bought for $9.5 billion in 2014. Microsoft is massively scaling back its in-house phone­making and cutting about 7,800 jobs. And while it’ll be time for holiday shopping before Dell and Hewlett-Packard have new PCs ready to take full advantage of Windows 10’s new features, the OS still brings in serious money. Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood said in April that it’s now worth about $15 billion a year, down from about $19 billion in 2013, the last time Microsoft disclosed Windows division revenue. Ninety-two percent of the 300 million PCs sold around the world each year run Windows, Gartner estimates, down from 95 percent two years ago.

Following his earnings report, Nadella told analysts that while Windows 10 would restore the OS division’s revenue growth, its effects would mostly be felt at least two quarters from now. He appears more focused on the company’s future beyond Windows: In June he distributed a mission statement to employees that listed the OS third among the three priorities of his tenure, behind “productivity services” (including Microsoft Office) and cloud platforms. “Windows has moved from a lead role to a support role,” Gartner’s Kleynhans says.

The Windows team continues to invest in research and development, including on projects beyond the PC, such as augmented-reality goggles that display holograms, and 84-inch touchscreen computers for a $20,000 corporate conference room setup. Windows chief Myerson says he’s trying to make sure Microsoft’s OS will be “the best home” for Office and Skype, among other company products.

In part, he says, that means following the process of regular updates and improvements that began with Windows Insider, as opposed to rolling out a new version of Windows every few years. (Corporate users who don’t want to be bothered to regularly update their systems can opt out.) It’s possible there won’t ever be another update so big that it requires a kickoff party. “Let’s put it this way,” Myerson says. “There’s nobody working on Windows 11.”

The bottom line: With Windows 10, Microsoft is trying to turn around a two-year slide in OS revenue, from $19 billion to $15 billion.





Thursday, July 30, 2015

EN MI OPINION: Por amor se han creado los hombres (Ricardo Tribin)

El muy sabio Saulo de Tarso hablaba del amor con gran sapiencia expresando que " El amor es sufrido, es benigno; el amor no tiene envidia, el amor no es jactancioso, no se envanece; no hace nada indebido, no busca lo suyo, no se irrita, no guarda rencor; no se goza de la injusticia, más se goza de la verdad. Todo lo sufre, todo lo cree, todo lo espera, todo lo soporta..... Y ahora permanecen la fe, la esperanza y el amor, estos tres; pero el mayor de ellos es el amor".

Este concepto tan bien expresado y que coincide con el legado de Jesús de Nazaret, quien lo dejo al mundo como el gran mandamiento cuando sintetizó su Voluntad diciendo " Amaos los unos a los otros", concepto que tristemente el hombre envilece cada día más tornando tan bella expresión en algo parecido a      " Armaos los unos contra los otros", tal como con profundidad lo expresara en su discurso ante la asamblea de las naciones el inolvidable Mario Moreno “Cantinflas” en la célebre película " Su excelencia".

Si el hombre y la mujer regresaran al amor, con seguridad que en la tierra habría más justicia, equidad, y paz, ya que en un corazón en donde reside el Amor, solo principios de sano vivir son los que adornaran su existencia. Convoquemos pues al reverdecer del Amor que nos permita estar en un presente mejor para dejar así sentadas de esta manera las bases para un futuro más plácido y feliz.


Miami, Julio 29 de 2015


Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Apple, Google, and Microsoft pledge to spend billions to fight climate change

The tech companies will invest in new clean energy for data centers, transportation, and other facilities

Apple's solar farm in Hongyuan, China.
As part of its continuing commitment to improve the environment, Apple has partnered with 12 other major companies and the White House and has taken the American Business Act on Climate Pledge.

The pledge includes agreements by the companies to spend some $140 billion in low-carbon investment and 1,600 megawatts of new renewable energy generation. Other company-specific goals target carbon emissions, water use, and more.

Apple has already met many of these goals on its own (which was made easier by its large cash pile and hefty profit margins) by running all its US operations and worldwide data centers on 100% renewable energy, and 87% of its total global operations on renewable energy.

In The White House press release announcing the pledge, all of the companies specify what they'll do to help the environment.

Apple pledges to bring 280 megawatts of clean power online by the end of 2016 across Arizona, California, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, and Sichuan Province, China — all places with Apple-owned data centers. Apple states that it has reduced carbon emissions from corporate facilities, data centers, and retail stores by 48% since 2011.

Other companies in the pledge include Alcoa, Bank of America, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Cargill, Coca-Cola, GM, Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, UPS, Walmart, and two tech giants: Google and Microsoft.

Google has pledged to spend billions to power its operations with 100% renewable energy, as well as use shuttle buses and corporately-owned electric vehicles to avoid 87 million vehicle miles per year, and reduce water, energy, and trash use at its California headquarters. The company is also providing software and cloud computing time and storage to power climate and weather models.

Microsoft's pledge is similar to Apple's. The company says it will continue running carbon neutral operations across its data centers, offices, labs, and manufacturing. For business air travel, Microsoft will purchase 100% renewable energy for its global operations and support carbon offset projects.

Apple is one of the few companies pledging to build its own power generation, with other companies promising to build clean energy for use by others or to purchase clean energy from utilities. Apple's corporate-owned energy generation facilities might take a lot of upfront capital, but the company will have more consistent and predictable energy prices going forward — a valuable thing for one of the world's largest companies.

For Apple, the environmental spending is primarily because the company believes in the cause, but being able to eliminate significant fluctuations in energy costs (which will likely increase over the next few decades) as well as ensure reliable access to power (and which may be just as important) will also be valuable.

As customers become more environmentally conscious, they will want the companies they buy from to be green too.

Does a company's environmentalism matter when you are purchasing products? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Thousands of Apps Secretly Run Ads That Users Can't See (BjusinessWeek)

Advertisers lose over $850 million per year to invisible fraud within mobile apps

The Apps World Multi-Platform Developer Show in London.
The Apps World Multi-Platform Developer Show in London.
There may be much more advertising in apps than it seems. Thousands of mobile applications are secretly running ads that can't be seen by users, defrauding marketers and slowing down smartphones, according to a new report by Forensiq, a firm that tracks fraud in online advertising.

Over the course of the 10-day study, one percent of all devices observed in the U.S. ran at least one app committing this kind of fraud; in Europe and Asia, two to three percent of devices encountered fake ads. Forensiq identified over 5,000 apps that display unseen ads on both Apple and Android devices. Advertisers are paying about $850 million for these ads each year, according to the report, and the apps with the highest rate of ad fraud can burn through 2 gigabytes of data per day on a single device. 

The sheer amount of activity generated by apps with fake ads was what initially exposed the scam. Forensiq noticed that some apps were calling up ads at such a high frequency that the intended audience couldn’t possibly be actual humans. The apps, says Forensiq, were hitting these numbers by showing as many as five ads in the background for every ad visible to users. Some apps continued to scroll through ads even after the app had been closed. 

Unlike many other types of malicious software, the apps also serve a legitimate purpose. Many of them are simple games or utilities, and they seem to have real users.“It’s not Angry Birds or Candy Crush, but these are apps that people play and enjoy and some real effort went into developing,” says David Sendroff, Forensiq’s founder and chief executive. 

Forensiq’s report doesn’t actually name any of the apps, but the firm revealed several of the suspicious apps to me. One of them was a breastfeeding app for Apple devices published by American Baby magazine and app developer Sevenlogics; the invisible ads tout Olive Garden, Amazon, and IBM. The newest version of the app has an average rating of 4 stars. One review, posted by someone describing herself as "Annoyed and Frustrated Mommy," expressed mixed feelings about the product. While it was a "livesaver" for a new mom, she found that 
"after a few months the freezes, restarts, and crashes became more frequent and persistent. I also noticed the pop up ads became more tricky to avoid accidentally clicking on, and now I swear my phone takes me straight to the App Store when I haven't even touched the screen after the pop up appears. Unfortunately it's too late for me to switch apps because all my info is wrapped up in this one." 

Alex Cheng, the president of Sevenlogics, says it hasn't added any code that would run invisible ads. He says the company does work with advertising technology who regularly change their own technology. "We are monitoring very closely with our ad vendors to prevent any intrusive advertisements," he says. A spokesman for Meredith Corporation, the publisher of American Baby, declined to comment. 

Complaints about crashing and slowness are also common on reviews for a series of silly games for Android devices with names like Waxing Eyebrows, Celebrity Baby, and Vampire Doctor, all published by the developer Girls Games Only. Forensiq’s video shows these also running code that produces a steady stream of unseen advertisements from companies like Microsoft, Coca-Cola, and Mercedes Benz. The performance issues are almost certainly caused by the extra load resulting from the apps' secondary functions, says Forensiq.

Girls Games Only did not respond to requests for comment. On Thursday its apps were suspended from the Google Play store. 

Surreptitiously running advertisements is a violation of the rules governing all apps available in Apple and Android stores. But it's tricky to identify what’s happening. The best way, says Sendroff, would be to monitor bandwidth usage over time—something Google and Apple might not have the ability to do. Apple declined to comment for this story, and Google didn’t respond to an interview request. 

The main limiting factor for this particular flavor of ad fraud may be economic. The average ad rates for mobile ads on the apps in the Forensiq report hovered around $1 per thousand views. People intent on making a living through a scam on mobile devices probably have more lucrative options.

Lookout, a security firm focused on mobile threats, says that most of the growth in mobile malware in the U.S. is coming from so-called ransomware, where criminals commandeer a phone and then demand money to unlock it. “Why am I going to do ad monetization when I can have something pop up and say I’m not going to unlock your device unless you give me $200,” says Michael Bentley, Lookout’s head of research and response. “The payoff per phone is just so low.” 

That said, the risk in ad fraud is also much lower. Fraud is endemic in the online advertising world, and the victims—the brands paying for the ads—often lose track of where their ads end up once they are traded through several automated layers of middlemen. If even the victims of a crime are unaware it’s going on, there’s probably less of a chance of anyone getting caught. 


Monday, July 27, 2015

Oil Warning: The Crash Could Be the Worst in More Than 45 Years (BusinessWeek)

Image result for Oil prices crash

Morgan Stanley has been pretty pessimistic about oil prices in 2015, drawing comparisons with the some of the worst oil slumps of the past three decades. The current downturn could even rival the iconic price crash of 1986, analysts had warned—but definitely no worse. 

This week, a revision: It could be much worse. 

Until recently, confidence in a strong recovery for oil prices—and oil companies—had been pretty high, wrote such analysts as Martijn Rats and Haythem Rashed in a report to investors yesterday. That confidence was based on four premises, they said, and only three have proven true.

1. Demand will rise: Check 

In theory: The crash in prices that started a year ago should stimulate demand. Cheap oil means cheaper manufacturing, cheaper shipping, more summer road trips. 

In practice: Despite a softening Chinese economy, global demand has indeed surged by about 1.6 million barrels a day over last year's average, according to the report. 

2. Spending on new oil will fall: Check 

In theory: Lower oil prices should force energy companies to cut spending on new oil supplies, and the cost of drilling and pumping should decline. 

In practice: Sure enough, since October the number of rigs actively drilling for new oil around the world has declined about 42 percent. More than 70,000 oil workers have lost their jobs globally, and in 2015 alone, listed oil companies have cut about $129 billion in capital expenditures. 

3. Stock prices remain low: Check 

In theory: While oil markets rebalance themselves, stock prices of oil companies should remain cheap, setting the stage for a strong rebound. 
In practice: Yep. The oil majors are trading near 35-year lows, using two different methods of valuation. 

4. Oil supply will drop: Uh-oh 

In theory: With strong demand for oil and less money for drilling and exploration, the global oil glut should diminish. Let the recovery commence. 
In practice: The opposite has happened. While U.S. production has leveled off since June, OPEC has taken up the role of market spoiler.  


For now, Morgan Stanley is sticking with its original thesis that prices will improve, largely because OPEC doesn't have much more spare capacity to fill and because oil stocks have already been hammered.

But another possibility is that the supply of new oil coming from outside the U.S. may continue to increase as sanctions against Iran dissolve and if the situation in Libya improves, the Morgan Stanley analysts said. U.S. production could also rise again. A recovery is less certain than it once was, and the slump could last for three years or more—"far worse than in 1986."

"In that case," they wrote, "there would be little in analysable history that could be a guide" for what's to come. 

Friday, July 24, 2015

Cómo liderear el Cambio: Edwin Conrado Rivera

Edwin Conrado Rivera, conocido coach de liderazgo y administración, ha ofrecido diversos seminarios en CAMACOL para aquellos interesados en ser mejores líderes de su negocio, empresa y comunidad. Próximamente ofrecerá otro ciclo de esa temática en CAMACOL y como parte demsu habitual colaboración con nuestro blog, no preparó los siguientes apuntes, muy oportunos, sobre ese tema:

 Como Liderar el Cambio*

Siguiendo con la ampliación de las 12 Funciones para Desarrollar Mentalidad de Liderazgo Mundial efectivo, hoy le presentamos:

¿Cómo Liderar el Cambio?

¿Quién Lidera el Cambio? - El líder es aquel que aunque tenga miedo al cambio es el que se enfrenta a sus miedos y camina hacia la implementación de dichos cambios. Alguien tiene que hacerlo, y es el líder el que está llamado a realizarlo. Solo quisiera que tenga en consideración que la “Mentalidad de Liderazgo Mundial” comienza en casa, con su esposo/a, hijos, y familiares.

Liderar, No Dirigir

La cantidad de cambios en las organizaciones ha crecido enormemente     en las últimas tres décadas, y la tasa de cambios sólo se acelerarán en los próximos años.

Los cambios y el liderazgo a través del “proceso de cambio” son las dos mayores preocupaciones más importantes de los CEO’s de hoy.

Los cambios del Siglo XXI deben de ser superados por el sobre control administrativo o la deficiente administración.  Por causa que la administración trabaja con el estado actual, y el liderazgo principalmente con el cambio, en el siglo siguiente vamos a tener que tratar de llegar a ser más hábiles en la creación de líderes efectivos, incluyendo directores, gerentes, vendedores, adiestradores, presentadores y ejecutivos de todos los niveles.

Por supuesto, la gestión del continuo cambio es importante. Se requiere una gestión competente para mantener los esfuerzos del cambio en proceso. Pero para la mayoría de las organizaciones, el reto más grande está liderando el cambio.

  •      Sólo el liderazgo incorrecto puede arruinar los cambios a través de las muchas    fuentes de inercia corporativa.

  •    Sólo el liderazgo efectivo puede motivar acciones necesarias para alterar el comportamiento de alguna manera significativa.

  •        Sólo el liderazgo bien enfocado puede conseguir pegar el cambio, anclándolo en la propia cultura de la organización.

Pero el liderazgo, no puede limitarse a un solo individuo que tenga los encantos de vida para tener seguidores obedientes. Las organizaciones modernas son demasiado complejas para ser transformadas por un solo líder. El esfuerzo de liderazgo debe tener el apoyo de muchas personas que asisten al programa de liderazgo dentro de su esfera de actividad.

El Líder, para implementar cambios, debe fomentar un sentido de urgencia dentro de la organización. "Una mayor tasa de urgencia no implica siempre presente el pánico, la ansiedad o el miedo. Esto significa un estado en que la complacencia es prácticamente ausente y la procrastinación inexistente."    
   
Descongele su estado actual

1. Establezca un sentido de urgencia, HOY y AHORA
Para llegar del punto A al B se necesita moverse. Las empresas que no están en constante movimiento se estancan. Pregúntese en que punto del camino esta su empresa y decida qué hacer para hacerla mover.

2. Desarrolle un equipo guía de colaboradores
Nadie puede hacer algo solo. Necesitamos un equipo de personas que nos ayuden a promover y desarrollar el cambio. Aquí le recomiendo analizar con quien usted cuenta para el proceso y que responsabilidad tendrán cada uno de sus miembros.

3. Desarrolle una nueva Visión y su Estrategia
Para cada nuevo cambio hay que desarrollar su propia Visión específica y las estratégias que le acompañan.  

4. Comunique el cambio de Visión
La forma de evitar las dudas y los malos entendidos, es comunicar los cambios de Visión constantemente hasta que la gente lo haga parte de sus procesos. Es responsabilidad de los Lideres mantener informado a todos los colaboradores en todos los niveles constantemente de cómo van los procesos de cambios. Hacer esto estimula la cooperación y la confianza en la empresa.

Introduzca nuevas prácticas a los procesos

1. Empodere el mayor número de personas para tomar acción
Mientras más personas sean parte del proceso de cambios, mejor serán sus resultados.  Los colaboradores están ansiosos de que se les den responsabilidades.  Sea claro y específico en el proceso de delegación.

2. Genere victorias a corto plazo
Para ganar grandes victorias, debemos comenzar con las pequeñas primero. Reconozca cuales son y agradezca a sus colaboradores por los resultados. Esto los estimula a seguir dando lo mejor de ellos.

3. Consolide las ganancias y produzca nuevos cambios
Cuando vaya obteniendo las ganancias económicas de los cambios, sea prudente en su administración. Utiliza parte de las ganancias para seguir promoviendo los cambios. Al final, la producción de ganancias se irá incrementando a medida que los cambios vayan teniendo lo resultados deseados.

Siembre los cambios en la cultura y haga que estos se amarren

4. Institucionalice los nuevos cambios a la cultura corporativa
Haga que los cambios sean parte de la cultura empresarial.   Que la Visión de los cambios sea vivida todos los días en la empresa. De esta manera se harán permanentes en todos los procesos corporativos.
Edwin Conrado Rivera, M.P.H. – Es Autor de varios libros de auto ayuda. Entre ellos, el curso de prevención en salud: “La Diabetes: El Árbol de las Enfermedades”.


Thursday, July 23, 2015

10 things you shouldn't expect big data to do (TechRepublic)

Many business leaders have embraced big data initiatives expecting miracles, only to discover that big data introduces new complexities -- and that reaping the benefits requires a lot more effort than they anticipated. 


hero

Every organization pursues big data with high hopes that it can answer long-standing business questions that will make the company more competitive in its markets and better in the delivery of products and services. Yet in the midst of this enthusiasm, it's easy to build false expectations for big data — benefits that will never materialize unless you give it the right amount of "help." Here are 10 key things that big data in itself won't do for you unless you take the right steps to optimize its value.

1: Solve your business problems

Big data doesn't solve business problems. People do. Only those organizations that sit down and decide what they want to get out of their big data before they start working with it are going to reap the calibre of business intelligence they're looking for.

2: Help your data management

IBM claims that 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are being generated daily. Most of this is big data. Unsurprisingly, the amount of data under management in companies around the world has grown exponentially, too. As the data piles up without clearcut data retention and usage policies (especially for big data), organizations are struggling to manage it.

3: Ease your security worries

For many companies, determining security access for big data is still an open item. This is because security practices for big data aren't as defined as they are for data that belongs to systems of record. We are at a point where IT should be working with end users to determine who gets access to which levels of big data and its corresponding analytics.

4: Address critical IT skill areas

Big data database management, server management, software development, and business analysis skills are in short supply. They add incremental burden to a core of critical IT skills that many IT departments already lack.

5: Diminish the value of legacy systems

If anything, legacy systems of record are more valuable than ever with big data. Often, it is these legacy systems that offer critical clues as to how to best dissect big data for analytics that can answer important business questions.

6: Simplify your data center

Big data requires parallel processing compute clusters and a different style of system management from traditional IT transaction and data warehouse systems. This means that energy consumption, cooling, software, hardware, and the systems skills needed to run these new systems will also be different.

7: Improve your data quality

The beauty of traditional transaction systems is that there are fixed data field lengths and comprehensive edits and validations on data that help get it into relatively clean form. Not so with big data, which is unstructured and can come in almost any form. This makes big data quality a major headache. Data quality is critical. If you don't have it, you can't trust the results of your data queries.

8: Validate current ROI metrics

The most common way to measure return on investment from systems of record is to monitor speed of transactions and then extrapolate what this means in terms of captured revenues (like how many new hotel reservations you can capture per minute). Speed of transactions is not a good metric for big data processing, which can take hours and even days to crank through a large cache of data and to run analytics. Instead, the best metric for gauging the effectiveness of big data processing is utilization, which should be above 90% on a regular basis (contrast this with transaction systems, which might be only 20% capacitized). It's important to develop these new ROI metrics for big data, because you still have to sell the CFO and other business leaders on big data investments.

9: Create less "noise"

Ninety-five percent of big data is "noise" that contributes little or nothing to business intelligence. Sifting through this data to get to the nuggets of intelligence that will truly help the business can be daunting.

10: Work every time

For years, universities and research centers ran big data experiments to derive elusive answers on genomes, drug research, and whether there was life on other planets. While some of these algorithms and queries yielded results, many more were inconclusive. There is tolerance for inconclusiveness in university and research environments, but not in corporate settings. This is where IT and other key decision makers need to manage expectations.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

AshleyMadison Hack Threatens Millions of Would-Be Adulterers (BusinessWeek)




What's the Motivation Behind the Ashley Madison Hack?

Adultery website AshleyMadison.com has been hacked, potentially exposing names, addresses, and sexual preferences of millions of would-be cheaters just as the site’s owner was preparing to go public.

Avid Life Media Inc., the Toronto company that runs the site with the tagline “Life is short, Have an affair,” said Monday that hackers had gained access to its systems and that it was working with police to investigate the breach.

A group or individual called The Impact Team has claimed responsibility for the attack, and has already leaked maps of company servers, staff information, and company bank accounts, according to cyber-security blog Krebs on Security. In a message overlaid on the AshleyMadison homepage, the hackers threatened to publish the stolen information unless the site and its peer EstablishedMen.com are taken offline.



“We will release all customer records, profiles with all the customers’ secret sexual fantasies, nude pictures, and conversations and matching credit card transactions, real names and addresses,” the hackers wrote, according to Krebs. “Avid Life Media will be liable for fraud and extreme harm to millions of users.”

While the company says it has closed the security holes and erased the hackers’ message and any personal information about users, it will do little good if the hackers have transferred the data elsewhere, said Rik Turner, an analyst at technology researcher Ovum in London. That, he said, would leave users open to extremely uncomfortable questions from spouses if the information is made public.

“For Christ’s sake, if you’re going to cheat don’t do it online and leave yourself open,” Turner said. “Unless you’ve been living in a cave for the past few years and not reading a paper or receiving any TV signal, it should be obvious that everything is hackable.”

Deleting Profiles

Avid Life -- which says AshleyMadison is the world’s second-largest paid Internet dating website, with 36 million users -- in April said it was considering an initial public offering this year to raise funds for international expansion.

Avid Life, which failed with an earlier IPO attempt in Canada, said it aimed to raise as much as $200 million in a London listing. The company says AshleyMadison had sales of $115 million last year, an almost fourfold increase from 2009. It makes money by charging for credits which can be used to pay for introductions to other would-be adulterers.

“We apologize for this unprovoked and criminal intrusion into our customers’ information,” Avid Life said in a statement. “We have always had the confidentiality of our customers’ information foremost in our minds, and have had stringent security measures in place.”

According to Krebs, the hackers said they carried out the attack due to the difficulty of deleting user profiles from the site. For about $20, AshleyMadison will carry out a so-called “full delete” to erase a user’s information. But the hackers said the site nonetheless kept purchase details, names and addresses.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Cheap Oil Is Bad for the Economy (at Least, So Far) (BusinessWeek)

Goldman finds that a decline in energy investment has outweighed gains from consumer spending

Image result for Gas prices
It's been about a year since oil prices started their historic drop, falling from above $100 a barrel to a bottom of about $45 in March. After creeping back to around $60, prices are shaky again amid news of a nuclear deal with Iran and record Saudi production.

And low oil prices are good for growth, right?

Cheap oil means cheap gasoline, and the assumption throughout the oil price rout has been that for the U.S. economy, built on consumer spending, cheap gas is all good. In theory, yes. In practice, it's been tough to find the benefits in the economic data this year. 

Goldman Sachs estimates that a decline in energy-related investment such as new drilling equipment, caused by low oil prices, subtracted about half a percentage point from economic growth during the first half. That's a pretty hefty bite out of a growth number that probably won't be much higher than 2.5 percent over the first six months of 2015. A note out from Goldman this week suggests that so far the negatives of inexpensive crude oil appear to have outweighed the spur to consumer spending. Goldman forecasts that the drop in oil prices will account for about 30 to 40 percent of the slowdown in economic growth from its annual pace at the end of last year. 

The firm reckons that layoffs and a slower pace of hiring in the oil patch have accounted for about 20 percent of the slowdown in total payroll growth so far this year. Through June, the economy has added an average of 208,000 new jobs a month. That's strong but compares with a monthly pace of 281,000 over the second half of 2014. The slump is particularly acute in the shale states of Texas, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Wyoming, and New Mexico, where a decline in drilling activity has spilled over into the broader economy and affected job growth across other industries


The worst of it appears to be over. Initial jobless claims in shale states have declined after a significant spike during the first months of the year. Layoff announcements from energy companies aren't quite as frequent or as large as they were back in the winter and spring. The total oil rig count in the U.S. as measured by Baker Hughes has stabilized over the past month at around 860, after falling by more than 50 percent since the end of November.
  
Drilling activity could plummet again, and layoffs begin to pick up, if there's a new selloff in the oil market. The difference between $60 crude and $45 crude is enormous for U.S. oil companies. There's reason to believe that we're on the verge of an M&A boom in the energy sector. While that would be good for the sector's balance sheets, it would probably end up leading to more layoffs. 

But that impact would probably be contained in states such as Texas and Oklahoma. Goldman suggests that there is "less reason to worry about broader growth trends—especially as that shock appears to be fading, and the positive effects of lower oil prices on consumption are starting to show through." Americans are driving more miles and buying vehicles at a near-record clip.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The U.S. savings rate remained above 5 percent for the first five months of the year, suggesting that household balance sheets are healthier than they've been in years. The national price of a gallon of regular gasoline has averaged $2.47 through July 13. That's more than $1 cheaper than the average price during the same period a year earlier. Based on the 137 billion gallons of gas consumed in the U.S. last year, that should roughly translate into an extra $137 billion in increased buying power. Recent data have begun to reflect that. In May, consumer spending rose by 0.9 percent, the biggest monthly increase in six years.  There is evidence that Americans are spending some of that gasoline savings on leisure items like books and sporting goods equipment.

So while the benefits of low oil prices have taken a while to show up, they are beginning to, just not in a big or consistent way. Americans still appear to be skittish about whether cheap gas is here to stay, so the gains in spending have been spotty, and only recently apparent.

Those consumer spending numbers in May didn't flow through to June as strongly as many had hoped. The most recent retail sales figures from the Commerce Department showed U.S. consumers cutting back on purchases last month.